It’s something that most of us do in our everyday working lives. It’s something that was, on occasion, expected when we were children – with a little help from our parents. It’s something that we sometimes do in our social lives. I am talking about dressing smartly.

I would like to discuss this in the context of David Cameron’s personal attack on Jeremy Corbyn’s appearance in the Commons. The question I would like to answer is whether or not a politician’s appearance really matters. I am going to lean on the side of “yes, it does.”

When we’re looking for a person to lead our country we want someone organised, trustworthy (relatively speaking, of course), up to date on issues both inside and outside of our borders, and with the capacity to solve problems that may arise for our country. Being the Prime Minister is a hefty responsibility and comes with all manner of tasks that need to be done, resources that need to be allocated and big decisions to make; leading a country is a taxing profession. So personally, when I’m casting my vote in the big election, if a candidate can’t even present themselves appropriately, it’s going to put me off voting for them. How can I trust someone to be in charge of the country that I live in when they can’t even do up their own tie? It’s a matter of confidence.

I will also say that it really shouldn’t matter from a policy perspective. Naturally, the better policies should be, and most often are, the deciding factor on whom I cast my vote for in the elections. I will vote for the party that I believe will lead the country to a better future, whether Labour, Conservative, UKIP, Green or Monster Raving Loony Party. However, it goes back to the point about trust. A party manifesto can include all of the most wonderful policies with no visible drawbacks and make everything seem clear cut, but if the candidate has a messy appearance, I find myself asking “can I trust this mess of a person to deliver if he/she can’t deliver a tidy appearance?” It’s not that difficult to dress smartly, especially when compared to decisions on spending cuts and a country’s fiscal policies for the following four years.

Another thing to consider is that our country’s prime minister is a figurehead. The prime minister is to be the face of our country on the global stage. Our prime minister will be discussing external affairs with the rest of the world, so a tidy appearance is a must there too. Personal presentation is just as important as the presentation of ideas or reforms, as again it falls to confidence. If I were the leader of a country and was going to talk with another politician who showed up with an unkempt appearance, I would be less willing to work with them than I would with someone who took the time to present themselves well. It may sound elitist or snooty, but it’s like showing up to work in an ordinary nine to five office job in tracksuit bottoms and a tank top; there are professional expectations with almost every job, and being a politician is certainly no exception.

Plus, if you’re giving a rival politician such trivial ammunition as your scruffy appearance, maybe you don’t deserve the position. There are so many worse things that politicians can dig for, but appearance is one that just requires some time in the morning to remedy. I’ve seen US elections, and they get a lot more personal, vicious and downright bitchy over there, so our politicians have it relatively easy by comparison!

Lexi Taylor

Photo credit: 70023venus2009 via Flickr

Categories: Comment


Appearance is important on the political stage

  1. What a pathetic article. You’d think he’d turned up to the Commons looking like a disheveled hobo in a bin liner. I mean, Jesus, he neglected to adequately attend to his top button; clearly he can’t be trusted to run a tuck shop let alone the country. Please, someone, fetch the guillotine!
    Don’t let’s mind that Corbyn is the most consistent politician in Parliament; Cameron and his cronies are adorned in the finest suits (at the taxpayers expense I might add) so are clearly way more reliable men of the people. Corbyn’s failure, meanwhile, to dress in the garb of a Georgian baron clearly renders him an utterly unprincipled charlatan. Never mind that his old Etonian counterparts have inhumanely cut support for disabled people to the tune of £30 per week while axing a whole range of provisions for the worst off in our society, such as maintenance grants for the poorest students and tax credits for low earners, in the comprehensive destruction of the welfare state — directly betraying a whole host election pledges. They wear a nice suit so clearly, none of that matters.
    Please, if you have a problem with Corbyn, spell it out. Have a proper debate. Judge him on his policies instead of propagating spurious caricatures of his dress sense as a smokescreen to trivialize the actual substance of the issues.
    What an absolute travesty that you’ve wasted your time throwing together this utter shambles of a tirade when you could have invested your time in making an actual political point. Perhaps you could have addressed the misery and poverty caused by Those Trustworthy Ones Who Dress Smart and their merciless attack on the most vulnerable members of society. Failing that, you could have used your time to do us all a favor by applying for an internship at the Daily Mail, where this kind of cheap politicking belongs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *