In the first of a series of lectures on ‘Consciousness, Culture and the Occult’, guest lecturer Dr. David Luke delivered a talk on his experimental work into psychedelics and pre-cognition His absorbing talk pulled the audience through the mystical field of South American psychedelic drugs, shamanism and pre-cognition. But was it really science?
David Luke, the ex-president of the Parapsychologist Association, started off the talk with an engrossing look at the history of occult rituals and practices. However, as interesting as the talk was, when he presented his own experimental work, which intertwines paranormal phenomena and the effects of psychedelic drugs, the lecture took a very surreal turn.
Parapsychologists study phenomena not traditionally associated with mainstream science, such as telepathy, telekinesis and near-death experiences. Luke’s interests lie within the psychology of luck, pre-cognition (the ability to predict the future) and psycho-pharmaceuticals.
Though the field of parapsychology has many critics and has suffered many controversial and fraudulent setbacks, many researchers such as Luke hope to find conclusive data on the paranormal within a scientific framework.
Like the 19th century psychologist, Hermann Ebbinghaus, Luke will happily serve as both experimenter and participant.
Looking into the possible effects of pre-cognition in a South American cactus-based psychedelic called Mescaline, Luke elected to conduct twenty trials on himself, and only himself, while recording highly suspect data on his own pre-cognitive abilities.
To make things worse, Luke administered decent sized quantities of this powerful drug on himself throughout the “experiment”. To test his drug-induced pre-cognitive abilities, he attempted to predict the random presentation of video clips from a selected library on his laptop.
He jotted down maniacal descriptions of what the following clips may be, before the laptop randomly selected one of four videos. Luke could then determine his success and reported that he achieved a success rate of 40%, significantly higher than the expected 25%, if he were to have no pre-cognition powers.
It is easy to criticise the experimental data Luke has collected, however for all its shortcomings the lecture was warm and interesting. Luke spoke on issues that he’s clearly very interested in and the audience got on well with him. He courteously spent a good deal of time fielding questions ranging from drug policy to individual drug experiences and their effects.
Fascinated from an early age in both science and altered states of consciousness, Dr. Luke decided to pursue an understanding through psychology. He obtained a first at the University of Westminster before going on to do his PhD at Northampton University.
However, he expressed disdain and disappointment at what he feels are limited answers provided by mainstream sciences in response to his main interests in psychedelics and the paranormal.
David Luke’s work on psychedelics is funded by the Beckley Foundation, a UK organization which promotes scientific based drug reform and exploration into the human consciousness. Luke also works as a research associate for the foundation.
So does David Luke conduct real science? Well, maybe it wasn’t the most rigorous of science. But when you’ve been given a grant to determine whether tripping out on top of a South American mountain gives you the ability to predict the future, it’s probably the fun that counts, not methodological prowess.
David Luke co-wrote ‘Palgrave Insights in Psychology: Anomalistic Psychology’, which is available on Amazon.com or any good psychology book-store. ‘Breaking Convention: Essays on psychedelic consciousness,’ also co-written by Luke, is out soon.