105 Views
5 Comments

Of polemics, ideologues and arrogance

For those attending the highly entertaining and always worthwhile Annual General Meeting of the Students Union last week, or for those who attended the Sussex Not for Sale meeting on the Credit Crunch a few weeks ago, several of the uglier traits of our otherwise nobly engaged student body displayed themselves.

If you don’t know, the USSU AGM is one of, if not the, largest AGM in the country. Speaking to sabbatical officers of other unions with a far larger student populations, it is clear that most other AGMs hover around the 20 – 70 mark; such a huge turnout from us puts most of them to shame, as well as providing an enormous mandate for our elected sabbatical officers (turnout in sabb elections is also much higher here than elsewhere).

This is all well and good. However, certain predictable debates take place; for the second time that I have been to the AGM a rowdy debate about whether or not to disaffiliate from the National Union of Students took place; the only difference this time was that this debate was sharpened by the recent furore over the new Constitution that has been proposed by the NUS leadership. In the end, it was decided to have a cross-campus ballot on the issue following the final decision on that new constitution. If, as is expected, that constitution is approved at annual conference, expect a referendum and accompanying campaigns sometime in the summer term.

The history of the relationship between Sussex and the NUS is a poor one. For years all this union did was turn up once a year to annual conference, behave badly, ignore all the other smaller regional meetings, and then leave wandering why everyone disliked Sussex so much, although this has changed in recent years.

If we are in a minority on many issues it is not because we are different or somehow special, but because we only engage in issues that we deem to care about. When I attended a regional meeting, I was struck not by the difference of ourselves to other Unions, but the enormous similarities in what we do, and how we do them; we might disagree with the majority of Unions on the Governance Review, but dwelling on this is to ignore the far larger (and actually far more important) other issues we do agree on; Keeping the Cap, No Platform, the Liberation Campaigns, etc. To extend that further, the enormous number of activities (that’s sports and societies) that students here do, which are replicated across the country. Opportunities exist to extend and enhance these through the NUS – unfortunately we are afflicted by a kind of tunnel vision that boils every debate down to a small number of issues that place an enormous intellectual chasm between us and the rest of the National Union, with us as an aloof, arrogant and elitist outsider that refuses to engage the NUS in a constructive manner.

What struck me about the NUS debate at the AGM this time around was not so much the content of the debate, but the sheer arrogance of it. It was suggested, repeatedly, that the NUS had never carried out any of our ‘demands’ – as if, after years of engaging in polemical rants about Blairite wannabes and neoliberalism once a year, anyone in the NUS was likely to care about the ‘demands’ of one Student Union (a small one at that) among thousands of others. It was also suggested that the only way to make the NUS leadership take us seriously was to leave our National Union. I doubt very much whether they would give two hoots about our leaving; certainly they expected as much last year. Aside from the £35,000 we give them, we have contributed little of real value in much of the last few years. As a result, aside from the benefits of being such a large purchasing consortium, we have gotten little out of it.

To continue the analogy, those of you who attended the Sussex Not for Sale meeting about the Credit Crunch would have witnessed a similar attitude; not one of a constructive engagement about issues directly relevant to students at Sussex (such as staff pensions, which were mentioned perhaps twice in 2 hours), but repeated, disconnected ramblings from the perspective of a world view that died sometime around when Stalin first started sending his citizens to the gulags. This is not to discredit the carefully considered and well thought through comments of Professor Van der Pijl; but rather to note how SNS runs a serious risk of being hijacked by that same attitude; that highly exclusive arrogance, an intellectual superiority that demands no dissent; that fails to understand the right of others to disagree; that sees violent protests against the Royal Navy and EDO as legitimate, whilst at the same time seeking to ban them from campus for supporting violence. There are very serious, pressing issues which the student body and SNS needs to engage with; staff pensions are one, but this will not happen with a persistent failure to listen to, rather than to lecture, the student body at large, and especially those who take the time to turn up to vitally important events as SNS or the AGM.

It was worthwhile noting that the debate about the NUS took place in the presence of the NUS general secretary.

When asked about what the NUS spends its money on, or what campaigns it runs, or why it doesn’t support free education, Richard Budden answered directly and honestly.

When questioned about a particularly ugly incident of racism at an NUS meeting, he answered, again, honestly, with all the relevant information and with no small amount of humility about the NUS’s failings. It would help Sussex a great deal if we could do the same when it came to ours.

Get the best viral stories straight into your inbox!

Don't worry, we don't spam

5 Comments

  1. I wish to fundamentally disagree with your reference to the Unions active engagement in NUS. I personally have been quite closely involved with NUS over the past two years and can say we have tried the utmost to become engaged. We have travelled the country, submitted policy, got involved in debates and constantly questioned and tried to hold the NUS to account.

    The problem is we’re now in a situation of “What’s the point”. When our submissions haven’t been outright ignored, we have often been mocked and jeered, our positions marginalised. Yes it provides a good service in many aspects, however its politically defunct.

    And it isn’t some bizzare elitism that we remain opposed to NUS (although it is in some cases). Its because we have genuine criticisms that they simply cannot answer to, namely the whole anti democratic process that surrounds NUS at every juncture. Under the current leadership and structures I have no confidence in there ability to defend student’s interests nationally, a view which is shared by many and increasing.

    I have already outlined my arguements of staying in the NUS (See Why Say No to Disaffiliation) and the need to fight within. However, next year the review on Higher Education is coming up and the NUS isn’t mobilising, but instead watering down its arguments and taken to casual discussion. Given how the last 10 years of this tactic has brought us near nothing and yet they have not learnt from their mistakes.

    In Europe, we have seen victories as mass mobilisation of students, teachers, staff and parents are in the process of fighting cuts, privitisation and bringing back free education, yet the NUS calls this “utopian” and takes us on a route that has failed time and time again.

    We need to change the NUS from within and fight to be represented. But NUS has staunchly remained committed so far to lay down and “lobby” and sell discount cards rather than proactively engage its own membership to fight.

    The question everyone is asking is why do we pay money and affiliate to a group that no longer represents us or our policies in anyway?

    Reply
  2. Lee, I do make a small qualifier to the argument about our involvement in the NUS, although perhaps it should have been made more strongly;

    I don’t wish to discredit yours and many other peoples more recent efforts in it, but I was specifically referring to what we did (or didn’t do) pre-governance review, most notably our failure to so much as to write a submission, or attend any consultations on it, the first time it came around. Our efforts to derail it, of which I was a part, are laudable, and as you point out in your article have led to some concessions.

    However, the overwhelming problem remains that we are in a severe minority on this issue; others support us on the governance and other things but our overall history with our national union remains a very poor one. There is nothing wrong with being in a minority; but if the new constitution is passed it won’t be because a ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ (to paraphrase hilary clinton) pulled a fast one. It’ll be because a large majority of student unions voted for it, three times (if we include last years EGM, which was appalling). It wont be as if, after 2 years, unions haven’t had the oppurtunity to debate the issue.

    No one denies that there are problems with our national union, but ive come to the conclusion that they are mainly problems perennial to all student unions; that many of the people most active and involved are simply using them as a stepping stone to other careers, specifically political ones (hence the widespread mirroring and/or non-opposition to government policy) the turnover of leadership is huge, policies lack continuity, and its senior management is, like all student unions, very inexperienced.

    Whats needed, and I think you will agree with me on this, is a long term effort to convince other student unions about the need for a different understanding of how the NUS achieves its aims. To explain, the question should not be whether we wish to be a union based on mass membership OR a political lobbying organisation; but rather which one of those options better protects the welfare and education of students in higher and further education in this country (which is surely the NUSs goal, no?). Personally I do not believe it is an either/or question in the first place, and that different circumstances call for NUS campaigning efforts to take different forms.

    Comparisons with other charities are valid here; take the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (an odd example I know). The RSPB is effective BOTH because it has a highly qualified and respected policy advisory capability AND because it has a mass membership of over a million fee-paying individuals throughout the country, which it can contact, seek funds from, the sheer number of whom highlight how seriously politicians should take its point of view.

    A couple of points to finish off; the RSPB is still deemed ‘radical’ enough to warrant BAA trying to bar its members from going anywhere near heathrow prior to climate camp of 2007. Secondly, one of the most radical NUS presidents of all time, branded by the foreign and commonwealth office as a ‘troublemaker acting with malice aforethought’ was, in fact, Jack Straw way back in 1969.

    Reply
  3. Who is anonymizzle? btw i have little intention of running for a sabb position, sorry to dissapoint.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Join the Badger Team

Apply today!

Latest Posts

Union obliterates the debate – unwritten requirement used to shut down free speech debate
Campus News
496 views1
Campus News
496 views1

Union obliterates the debate – unwritten requirement used to shut down free speech debate

Jordan Wright - April 27, 2018

Student society Liberate the Debate’s most recent event was cancelled over a lack of compliance with the Students' Union's (USSU) requirement for a neutral chair - a…

Verve Couture – Musicality, kitsch & ignition: the beginning of a series
Arts
21 views
Arts
21 views

Verve Couture – Musicality, kitsch & ignition: the beginning of a series

Ricardo Reverón Blanco - June 17, 2018

Pictured: Zac Black At Proud Cabaret audiences were spellbound as if at night at the circus, yet this was not like Angela Carter’s magical realist novel; Verve…

Fleabag on stage at The Old Market – review
Arts
73 views
Arts
73 views

Fleabag on stage at The Old Market – review

Florence Dutton - June 11, 2018

[caption id="attachment_35513" align="alignnone" width="2400"] Fleabag at Soho Theatre[/caption] Last Monday at 8pm at Brighton’s The Old Market, I sat myself down in my theatre seat eagerly awaiting…

Fleabag preview
Arts
83 views
Arts
83 views

Fleabag preview

Florence Dutton - June 2, 2018

[caption id="attachment_35513" align="alignnone" width="2400"] Fleabag at Soho Theatre[/caption] Following the mass success of the Bafta award-winning BBC Series, DryWrite and Soho Theatre are about to hit the…

Brighton Festival: Ezra Furman at the Dome
Arts
107 views
Arts
107 views

Brighton Festival: Ezra Furman at the Dome

Georgia Grace - June 1, 2018

Having completed my final semester of university with modules on punk history and queer arts, it was fitting that I rounded off my end-of-assessment celebrations by attending…

Arts
128 views

The Tempest review

Georgia Grace - May 30, 2018

As the sun begins to set over Hove Green, tinnies of Red Stripe are cracked open, tartan blankets are strewn, and families tuck into their picnic hampers.…

A Glass Half Empty review
Arts
140 views
Arts
140 views

A Glass Half Empty review

Georgia Grace - May 27, 2018

For those of us coming to the end of another year of university study, the prospect of careers, marriages and babies may seem a long way off.…

DollyWould at The Old Market review
Arts
132 views
Arts
132 views

DollyWould at The Old Market review

Alex Hutson - May 27, 2018

Sh!t Theatre’s DollyWould is a hilarious, thoughtful and experimental performance piece. The award winning show has the Sh!t Theatre duo integrating comedy, storytelling, personal experience and music.…

UCU Launch Petition to End the ‘Hostile Environment’ at Sussex
Campus News
210 views
Campus News
210 views

UCU Launch Petition to End the ‘Hostile Environment’ at Sussex

Billie-Jean Johnson - May 26, 2018

The Sussex branch of the University and College Union (UCU) has launched a petition calling for Vice-Chancellor Adam Tickell to end the 'hostile environment' at Sussex. The…

Arts
98 views

Shakespeare in the sun – The Tempest preview

Georgia Grace - May 24, 2018

In a world of dystopian King Lears and female Hamlets, Shakespeare’s classics are constantly being reimagined for the modern day. There’s something oddly refreshing then about the…

Review: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)
Arts
196 views
Arts
196 views

Review: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)

Sophie Coppenhall - May 23, 2018

What a phenomenal contrast these two films present when watched side-by-side. In essence, together they are capable of tracing inner and outer metamorphoses of their subjects. The…

Dollywould at The Old Market preview
Arts
129 views
Arts
129 views

Dollywould at The Old Market preview

Alex Hutson - May 22, 2018

From the 22nd May - 25th May 2018 DollyWould will be showing at The Old Market. An exciting new show, presented by Sh!t Theatre, who won the…

Exhibition: Io-sono Fedilouu
Artist Focus
203 views
Artist Focus
203 views

Exhibition: Io-sono Fedilouu

Ricardo Reverón Blanco - May 16, 2018

Last week artist Fedilou made her debut exhibition in the downstairs space of Morelli Zorelli, a quaint vegan Italian restaurant in Hove, featuring a collection of intimate…

Interview with Philosophy faculty and COGS director Ron Chrisley
Interview
140 views
Interview
140 views

Interview with Philosophy faculty and COGS director Ron Chrisley

Nikolaos Manesis - May 15, 2018

Ron Chrisley is a Reader in Philosophy, on the faculty of the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, and is the director of COGS (Centre for Cognitive Science).…

Adam review
Arts
209 views
Arts
209 views

Adam review

Ketan Jha - May 13, 2018

If you have been a stranger to the stage this spring and decide to see one contemporary show, let it be Adam. This reviewer went in entirely…

Brighton Fringe Preview: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)
Arts
229 views
Arts
229 views

Brighton Fringe Preview: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)

Sophie Coppenhall - May 13, 2018

In celebration of iconic Brighton local, legendary alt-rock musician (and episodic actor) Nick Cave, TOM’s Film Club are hosting a double-bill screening of his films at The…

Whimsical fairy-tale meets class war – Standard: Elite review
Arts
271 views
Arts
271 views

Whimsical fairy-tale meets class war – Standard: Elite review

Georgia Grace - May 11, 2018

Meta-theatricality and interactivity are becoming all the more vogue in contemporary theatre, and in a world where the arts are becoming increasingly open and democratised, I find…

A Year of Art Society: The Best Picks
Artist Focus
187 views
Artist Focus
187 views

A Year of Art Society: The Best Picks

Alex Leissle - May 9, 2018

  [gallery type="slideshow" ids="35385,35386,35387,35388,35389,35390,35391,35392,35393,35394,35395,35396,35397,35398,35399,35400,35401,35402,35403,35404,35405,35406,35407,35408,35409,35410,35411"]

More Brit(ish) than ever: A review of Afua Hirsch at Brighton Festival
Books
189 views
Books
189 views

More Brit(ish) than ever: A review of Afua Hirsch at Brighton Festival

William Singh - May 9, 2018

Afua Hirsch’s 2018 book - part memoir, part polemic - provokes mixed feelings. So too did her discussion of the topic at this year’s Brighton Festival. Don’t…

Ethnic-bioweapons: between conspiracy and reality
Science
243 views
Science
243 views

Ethnic-bioweapons: between conspiracy and reality

Luke Richards - May 8, 2018

Bioweapons exist, while ethnic-bioweapons are whispered conspiracies. Pandemics can fairly hazardous to human life, the 1918 Flu Pandemic killed 20-50 million people. A man made pandemic could…

Breaking: Spring referenda results announced
News
257 views
News
257 views

Breaking: Spring referenda results announced

Jessica Hubbard - May 4, 2018

Students have voted to support the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, reject Prevent and adopt new Gender Equality policies. Results for the Students' Union referenda were…