The University of Sussex is challenging a £585,000 fine imposed by the Office for Students (OfS) over alleged breaches of free speech and governance regulations, as a judicial review begins today in the High Court.
The dispute, now in its third year, raises pressing questions about how universities are monitored, the interpretation of free speech obligations, and who ultimately bears the cost when regulatory decisions collide with student welfare.
For three and a half years, Sussex has been under scrutiny. The OfS’s investigation focused on the university’s Trans and Non-Binary Equality Policy Statement, claiming it could have a “chilling effect” on lawful expression by students and staff. In March 2025, the regulator issued a £585,000 fine, framing the penalty as proportionate to what it described as serious and sustained breaches.
Sussex disputes the findings. Vice-Chancellor, Sasha Roseneil, described the ruling as “wrong” and a “travesty” of the regulator’s purpose. In an exclusive interview with The Badger, she criticised the investigation as excessively long and opaque. “They pursued Sussex for three and a half years without a single substantive meeting or campus visit,” Roseneil said. “I think your outrage should really be directed at the Office for Students here. They’re not acting in the interest of students.”
The OfS has maintained that the fine was necessary to enforce compliance, framing Sussex’s policies as potentially restrictive of lawful debate. Yet the university argues that the policy was never designed to limit speech, but to protect vulnerable students, including trans and non-binary students, from harassment and discrimination.
Lewis, Education and Employability Officer at the Students’ Union, echoed concerns about the fine’s scale and potential impact on student life. “£585,000 is thirteen times higher than any previous OfS penalty,” he said. “Even if Sussex had done something wrong – which I don’t think it did – this is wholly disproportionate. The previous largest fine was for a university failing to publish its financial statements.”
Lewis also highlighted the potential consequences for the Students’ Union, whose block grant funds societies, sports teams, media groups, and student services. “With limited resources already, this could be the difference between maintaining programs and making cuts,” he said.
The controversy has sparked broader concerns about selective enforcement. Sussex is not the only university to issue similar policy statements, yet it has faced the largest financial penalty to date. Critics suggest that political pressures may influence how the OfS applies its regulations, raising questions about consistency and fairness across the sector.
The judicial review will examine whether the OfS acted lawfully and proportionately in imposing the fine. Its outcome could set a precedent for universities nationwide, shaping how free speech duties are balanced against equality policies and protections for vulnerable students. A ruling in favour of Sussex may reaffirm institutions’ ability to implement protections for vulnerable students without fear of disproportionate sanction. A ruling in favour of the OfS would solidify the regulator’s authority to impose substantial fines, potentially reshaping the sector’s approach to free speech and student protections.
As Lewis observed, “If the Office for Students is truly for students, it should be supporting institutions that defend and protect them – not penalising them for it.”
For Sussex students, the outcome will determine more than whether a fine is upheld. It could shape how free speech is interpreted on campus, how equality policies are enforced, and how safe students feel within their university community.
The Badger has contacted the Office for Students for comment but has not received a response.
Another article you may enjoy: https://thebadgeronline.com/2026/01/reform-society-sparks-protests-on-campus/