261 Views
5 Comments

Unfair punishment sounds alarm bells

Last week a curfew was imposed on a politically active student for his involvement in an action drawing attention to the operation of military interests through an innocuous-seeming social organisation on campus.

‘Flexing its authoritarian muscle over its students through such draconian measures is barring them from participating fully in campus life’

This should set alarm bells ringing for us all. There is no doubt that this disciplinary measure has been strategically designed to silence a politically active voice. The measure is damaging to Koos Couvee’s ability to function as a student and has no relation to the nature of the incident that it purports to punish: it is a straightforward attack on his individual freedom of movement and of association.

With the motion to rid Sussex of its military presence (put forward and defended by Koos) having been passed indicatively at the AGM and soon to be decided in a referendum, there is no doubt that the URNU will benefit enormously from the terms of this ‘punishment’. The same can be said of the university bureaucracy with regards to Koos’s activity in the Sussex not for Sale campaign. Most campaign meetings take place outside of the hours of curfew, as do drinks in the bars with friends.

In flexing its authoritarian muscle over its students through such draconian measures as barring them from participating fully in campus life, the university presumes to be able to regulate our private lives in its own interests.

Several articles and comments in this paper over the past few weeks have been bemoaning student apathy and lack of political engagement. Whatever your opinions of the URNU or of the action, Koos was part of a small group of students acting with conviction and political passion to try to make Sussex University a more ethical place.

They were doing so with few resources, and against the economic and political might not only of the university bureaucracy, but also that of the state, who directly fund URNU activities. The vast asymmetry of power here ought to make any appeals to an abstract un-probed ‘freedom of speech’ ring hollow and ridiculous in this case. And yet this ‘punishment’ is precisely designed to remove a student’s capacity for free political activity.

As seen in the recent pre-emptive barring of targeted students from the graduate fair and the invitation of police onto campus in advance of the Shut ITT demo, the university administration would love to silence this sort of dissent. It inconveniences them, damaging their brand name, and disrupts their ability to function and profit as a commercial service selling us our education as consumers of a product. This type of political ‘discipline’ goes hand in hand with the proposed plans for the marketisation of the university.

We must not think that this is one student’s problem and does not concern us: our right to freedom of movement and freedom of political expression is essential to our lives as students and as citizens. It may look as though this stealth silencing by bureaucracy of one active individual is not such a big deal, but as Koos observed in last week’s article “the university is setting a precedent.” That precedent indicates that “the core Sussex values of freedom of speech and association” will be blindly defended for those representing state and corporate interests, but do not apply to its own students. We must condemn this action by the university bureaucracy, and in doing so defend our basic rights.

Get the best viral stories straight into your inbox!

Don't worry, we don't spam

5 Comments

  1. To even remotely suggest that Sussex URNU will “benefit” from Mr Coovee’s disciplinary proceedings shows just how bady informed some people (i.e. you) are of the whole situation. The URNU will NOT be in a better position whatsoever as a result of this and I find it extremely disappointing that ANY student has had to have action taken against them for standing up for something they believe in. The URNU has had nothing to do with the proceedings as it does not concern us. The University authorities have clearly felt that they had little choice in this scenario and the fact that Mr Coovee admitted the charge says everything. I sincerely hope that he can successfully continue with his studies for the foreseeable future.

    Reply
  2. Dear Simon –

    In response to your comments above…

    “I find it extremely disappointing that ANY student has had to have action taken against them for standing up for something they believe in. The URNU has had nothing to do with the proceedings as it does not concern us … I sincerely hope that he can successfully continue with his studies for the foreseeable future.”

    Unfortunately Koos Couvee’s studies will certainly be disrupted by this curfew – for one thing he is unable to access the library in the evenings after having campaigned for extended opening hours. He has himself stated that this punishment will impact on his ability to complete his degree successfully. Nobody has suggested that the URNU had any influence over the terms of the punishment. Given the fact that this punishment IS detrimental to his ability to function as a student can I ask you what punishment you/the URNU would have called for instead?

    “To even remotely suggest that Sussex URNU will “benefit” from Mr Coovee’s disciplinary proceedings shows just how bady informed some people (i.e. you) are of the whole situation. The URNU will NOT be in a better position whatsoever as a result of this.”

    The URNU’s existence is currently under threat following the motion to get rid of military-affiliated bodies from university premises being passed to go to referendum at AGM. Koos Couvee was a key figure in the campaign to rid Sussex of military-affiliated bodies (he put forward the motion); this campaign will directly suffer from his political voice having been stifled through this curfew (he cannot attend meetings or talks in the evening). So of course URNU is in a better position as a result of the campaign that poses a threat to its existence having to some extent lost a key campaigning voice.

    “The University authorities have clearly felt that they had little choice in this scenario.”

    I could understand that perhaps they felt they had ‘little choice’ over the need to impose some sort of punishment on Koos Couvee as an example – especially as this sort of student action might strain the university’s relations with the military. But they have absolute choice over the terms of the punishment. These particular terms are politically motivated, for reasons outlined above. Politically motivated punishments are unacceptable.

    “…the fact that Mr Coovee admitted the charge says everything.”

    What does it say? He admitted having taken part because he did. As to the unviersity’s charge of ‘intimidation’, this is what he says:
    “After having initially denied the allegations mentioned above, in the hearing I partially admitted to them, simply because I wanted to avoid a discussion on the semantics of ‘intimidation’, or ‘harassment’, and instead chose to justify my actions politically. I did however point out that the language used in the allegations was way too strong and inappropriate language to convey what had happened.”

    Reply
  3. I don’t see why Mr Couvee is surprised. Such open and gleeful vandalisation could hardly be allowed to slide without the university taking action. At the least this constitutes damage to public property.
    Politically, he is unjustified. Does he think the university is his? It isn’t. He applied to it, the existence of clubs such as the URNU being widely known. A place at the university is not his by right, and his actions were presumably acutely embarassing for the university and therefore they are perfectly justified in their punishing him. While they do not object to students holding and expressing political views, discomfiting other organisations on their campus reflects poorly on them. Peaceful protest is perfectly reasonable. If Mr Couvee seeks a more physical manifestation of his views he ought to restrain himself until after his degree, or be prepared to suffer the consequences of his actons. He seems to consider himself immune as he believes himself politically justified. Should it be permissible to vandalise the recruiters for every club and society which a student happens to have an objection to? Painting the rowing club, say? And when the university demands an explanation, the vandal can say, “Yes, but it was my political beliefs,” to which the university would bow in defeat.
    Lastly, mounting such a campaign against the URNU is mindless. Cadets hardly participate in overseas campaigns: indeed they certainly serve a more helpful role in society than Mr Couvee, as they assist stranded boats and yachts at sea. In addition, a mere 23% continue on to an Armed Forces career, and, in general, these are people who have joined the URNU with the specific intention of building a foundation for naval employment they would in any case have continued on to, and not as a result of recruitment withing the URNU. It provides training in various aspects of life for many people and enables them to have successful careers in completely unmilitary fields following their degree. Furthermore, it acts as a part time job and gives valuable experience to those who might not otherwise be able to afford it. Is Mr Couvee seeking to take away this splendid opportunity from fellow students, particularly ones that are not so reckless with their employment and positions at university that they wantonly engage in antisocial activities as Mr Couvee? There are numerous pacifists sevring in the URNU, all hoping to embark on a variety of careers. In one case a female cadet later applied to the UN. The understanding of the military which she gained was invaluable in this career, particularly in her pacifist capacity, which was justified by her understanding. Mr Couvee clearly has no understanding of the URNU entity.
    I am astounded that the RN has not pressed charges, while the university has been perfectly justified. This type of campaigning is bound to meet with repercussions, and surely this was perfectly evident to Mr Couvee before he mounted his attack. He should consider himself extremely lucky to still be attending university and not to have been arrested. However, it is admittedly unfair that the other participants in the attack, if, indeed, their actions were similar, were not similarly treated.

    Reply
  4. I agree, the university was justified in doing that. I hate how people vandalize stuff.

    The other day I saw “SMASH EDO” spraypainted on a house on my street. It made me so angry that someone could vandalize a house like that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Join the Badger Team

Apply today!

Latest Posts

Union obliterates the debate – unwritten requirement used to shut down free speech debate
Campus News
498 views1
Campus News
498 views1

Union obliterates the debate – unwritten requirement used to shut down free speech debate

Jordan Wright - April 27, 2018

Student society Liberate the Debate’s most recent event was cancelled over a lack of compliance with the Students' Union's (USSU) requirement for a neutral chair - a…

Verve Couture – Musicality, kitsch & ignition: the beginning of a series
Arts
23 views
Arts
23 views

Verve Couture – Musicality, kitsch & ignition: the beginning of a series

Ricardo Reverón Blanco - June 17, 2018

Pictured: Zac Black At Proud Cabaret audiences were spellbound as if at night at the circus, yet this was not like Angela Carter’s magical realist novel; Verve…

Fleabag on stage at The Old Market – review
Arts
75 views
Arts
75 views

Fleabag on stage at The Old Market – review

Florence Dutton - June 11, 2018

[caption id="attachment_35513" align="alignnone" width="2400"] Fleabag at Soho Theatre[/caption] Last Monday at 8pm at Brighton’s The Old Market, I sat myself down in my theatre seat eagerly awaiting…

Fleabag preview
Arts
83 views
Arts
83 views

Fleabag preview

Florence Dutton - June 2, 2018

[caption id="attachment_35513" align="alignnone" width="2400"] Fleabag at Soho Theatre[/caption] Following the mass success of the Bafta award-winning BBC Series, DryWrite and Soho Theatre are about to hit the…

Brighton Festival: Ezra Furman at the Dome
Arts
108 views
Arts
108 views

Brighton Festival: Ezra Furman at the Dome

Georgia Grace - June 1, 2018

Having completed my final semester of university with modules on punk history and queer arts, it was fitting that I rounded off my end-of-assessment celebrations by attending…

Arts
128 views

The Tempest review

Georgia Grace - May 30, 2018

As the sun begins to set over Hove Green, tinnies of Red Stripe are cracked open, tartan blankets are strewn, and families tuck into their picnic hampers.…

A Glass Half Empty review
Arts
140 views
Arts
140 views

A Glass Half Empty review

Georgia Grace - May 27, 2018

For those of us coming to the end of another year of university study, the prospect of careers, marriages and babies may seem a long way off.…

DollyWould at The Old Market review
Arts
133 views
Arts
133 views

DollyWould at The Old Market review

Alex Hutson - May 27, 2018

Sh!t Theatre’s DollyWould is a hilarious, thoughtful and experimental performance piece. The award winning show has the Sh!t Theatre duo integrating comedy, storytelling, personal experience and music.…

UCU Launch Petition to End the ‘Hostile Environment’ at Sussex
Campus News
211 views
Campus News
211 views

UCU Launch Petition to End the ‘Hostile Environment’ at Sussex

Billie-Jean Johnson - May 26, 2018

The Sussex branch of the University and College Union (UCU) has launched a petition calling for Vice-Chancellor Adam Tickell to end the 'hostile environment' at Sussex. The…

Arts
99 views

Shakespeare in the sun – The Tempest preview

Georgia Grace - May 24, 2018

In a world of dystopian King Lears and female Hamlets, Shakespeare’s classics are constantly being reimagined for the modern day. There’s something oddly refreshing then about the…

Review: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)
Arts
197 views
Arts
197 views

Review: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)

Sophie Coppenhall - May 23, 2018

What a phenomenal contrast these two films present when watched side-by-side. In essence, together they are capable of tracing inner and outer metamorphoses of their subjects. The…

Dollywould at The Old Market preview
Arts
130 views
Arts
130 views

Dollywould at The Old Market preview

Alex Hutson - May 22, 2018

From the 22nd May - 25th May 2018 DollyWould will be showing at The Old Market. An exciting new show, presented by Sh!t Theatre, who won the…

Exhibition: Io-sono Fedilouu
Artist Focus
204 views
Artist Focus
204 views

Exhibition: Io-sono Fedilouu

Ricardo Reverón Blanco - May 16, 2018

Last week artist Fedilou made her debut exhibition in the downstairs space of Morelli Zorelli, a quaint vegan Italian restaurant in Hove, featuring a collection of intimate…

Interview with Philosophy faculty and COGS director Ron Chrisley
Interview
140 views
Interview
140 views

Interview with Philosophy faculty and COGS director Ron Chrisley

Nikolaos Manesis - May 15, 2018

Ron Chrisley is a Reader in Philosophy, on the faculty of the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, and is the director of COGS (Centre for Cognitive Science).…

Adam review
Arts
209 views
Arts
209 views

Adam review

Ketan Jha - May 13, 2018

If you have been a stranger to the stage this spring and decide to see one contemporary show, let it be Adam. This reviewer went in entirely…

Brighton Fringe Preview: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)
Arts
230 views
Arts
230 views

Brighton Fringe Preview: Nick Cave Double Bill at The Old Market (TOM’s Film Club)

Sophie Coppenhall - May 13, 2018

In celebration of iconic Brighton local, legendary alt-rock musician (and episodic actor) Nick Cave, TOM’s Film Club are hosting a double-bill screening of his films at The…

Whimsical fairy-tale meets class war – Standard: Elite review
Arts
271 views
Arts
271 views

Whimsical fairy-tale meets class war – Standard: Elite review

Georgia Grace - May 11, 2018

Meta-theatricality and interactivity are becoming all the more vogue in contemporary theatre, and in a world where the arts are becoming increasingly open and democratised, I find…

A Year of Art Society: The Best Picks
Artist Focus
188 views
Artist Focus
188 views

A Year of Art Society: The Best Picks

Alex Leissle - May 9, 2018

  [gallery type="slideshow" ids="35385,35386,35387,35388,35389,35390,35391,35392,35393,35394,35395,35396,35397,35398,35399,35400,35401,35402,35403,35404,35405,35406,35407,35408,35409,35410,35411"]

More Brit(ish) than ever: A review of Afua Hirsch at Brighton Festival
Books
190 views
Books
190 views

More Brit(ish) than ever: A review of Afua Hirsch at Brighton Festival

William Singh - May 9, 2018

Afua Hirsch’s 2018 book - part memoir, part polemic - provokes mixed feelings. So too did her discussion of the topic at this year’s Brighton Festival. Don’t…

Ethnic-bioweapons: between conspiracy and reality
Science
245 views
Science
245 views

Ethnic-bioweapons: between conspiracy and reality

Luke Richards - May 8, 2018

Bioweapons exist, while ethnic-bioweapons are whispered conspiracies. Pandemics can fairly hazardous to human life, the 1918 Flu Pandemic killed 20-50 million people. A man made pandemic could…

Breaking: Spring referenda results announced
News
258 views
News
258 views

Breaking: Spring referenda results announced

Jessica Hubbard - May 4, 2018

Students have voted to support the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, reject Prevent and adopt new Gender Equality policies. Results for the Students' Union referenda were…